The Media Accountability Project  

"Hormis le fait que vous donniez le nombre de victimes palestiniennes après celles du côté israélien et que vous ne mentionniez pas l’occupation israélienne de la bande de Gaza, vous citez rapportez le Hamas pour rapporter le nombre de victimes palestiniennes. Or, vous devriez plutôt indiquer la référence au ministère palestinien de la Santé. Citer le Hamas revient à décrédibiliser et déshumaniser le nombre de morts du côté palestinien."

"Votre article est extrêmement biaisé et c’est inquiétant que de tels mots aient été publiés alors qu’ils contreviennent à vos obligations journalistiques de ne pas propager de discours haineux."

"Stating that the pro-Palestine protesters are supporting Hamas is inaccurate to say the least. You can be pro-Palestine and not support Hamas. You can be pro-Palestine and push for a one-state solution with Israel. Most people showing up at these protests want the Israeli occupation to end, which is the sole responsible for how Palestinians in Gaza are treated. Such language discredits the cause of the Palestinian resistance and liberation and adds to the fuel of anti-Palestinian hate."

"Alors que vous invoquez clairement le blocus de Gaza depuis 15 ans, un peu plus haut dans votre article, avec les mots suivants : « soumise à un blocus israélien terrestre, aérien et maritime depuis plus de 15 ans », il est désolant que vous citiez le secrétaire d’État américain qui jette le blâme sur les Palestiniens pour la situation et les pertes actuelles à Gaza."

"However, it should be mentioned that the article’s emphasis on how uncommon it is for Israeli soldiers to be prosecuted obscures the outrage that 10 days of imprisonment is at all an adequate punishment. Human rights groups are understandably concerned by such light sentencing."

"I urge you to redact your previous statement about “terrorist” attacks and refrain from using the word “terrorist” in future broadcasts unless it refers to specific instances that meet the widely accepted definition, as described by the IPI."

In particular, I take issue with your subjective characterization of Hamas as an “extremist” group. By using the term “extremist” you are stating an opinion as fact. While the United States and some Western countries consider Hamas a terrorist group, this is not universally agreed upon. 

"Netanyahu’s judicial coup is certainly alarming, but it is not a radical departure from Israel’s foundational principles which always privileged the rights of one group over another."

If Michael Mostyn has a definition of antisemitism which implies that Palestinians are undeserving of self-determination and basic rights codified by international humanitarian law, then perhaps he needs to rethink his definition of antisemitism.

"Jama’s critics (and subsequently, your article) are wildly misrepresenting the meaning of the Palestinian chant, “From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free,” which is a simple and legitimate call for freedom for all Palestinians under Israeli rule. Yousef Munayyer writes in Jewish Currents that the chant refers to “a state in which Palestinians can live in their homeland as free and equal citizens, neither dominated by others nor dominating them.” As he writes, “the claim that [it] carries a genocidal intent relies not on the historical record, but rather on racism and Islamophobia.”