The Media Accountability Project  

"Based on the abundant information available about Israel’s continued attacks on Lebanon that was available even at the time this Associated Press article went to press, it should be revised to include that not only that 'attacks in Iran and Gulf Arab countries resumed on Wednesday,' but also, that Israel continued to attack Lebanon after the ceasefire was announced on Tuesday and Wednesday."

"Yakabuski defames Lewis and his team by portraying them as inherently antisemitic simply for being allies of the Palestinian movement. Mr. Yakabuski also portrays support for Palestinian rights as inherently suspect or extremist, by implying  that the presence of Palestinian symbolism, such as flags or keffiyehs, at the NDP convention is indicative of antisemitism within the party. To be clear, I believe these passages constitute forms of anti-Palestinian racism, as defined by the Arab Canadian Lawyers Association. This includes 'defaming Palestinians and their allies with slander such as being inherently antisemitic' in order to silence their narratives and advocacy."

Specifically, the article gives her space to claim that coordinated U.S. strikes are “necessary” to eliminate what Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has described as an “existential threat” posed by Iran’s nuclear program and its regime. Presented without challenge or context, this framing leaves readers with the impression that Iran’s nuclear program constitutes an established and imminent threat, when in reality this remains deeply contested.

The structural imbalance is evident in the article’s selective placement of viewpoints. The piece prominently features pro-Israel advocacy organizations, such as CIJA and B’nai Brith Canada, alongside quotes from Liberal MP Anthony Housefather. Meanwhile, a single quote from Independent Jewish Voices, raising concerns that the bill could curb legitimate protest and risk criminalizing dissent, is buried at the end. 

Without including this information, readers are left with the misleading impression that only Iran is using the ‘oil weapon’ when in reality Israel, in collaboration with the United States, is also using the ‘oil weapon’. Your headline ‘Iran is using the oil weapon’ further reinforces this misperception.

If you would like to respond to alerts like this, sign up to become a Media Responder.

Canadians for Justice and Peace in the Middle East believes Prime Minister Mark Carney should categorically rule out Canadian participation in this war. The U.S.–Israel conflict with Iran is deeply unpopular among Canadians, and even Carney stated it violates international law.

"Giddy for war, the Globe and Mail's editorial board explicitly dismisses international law and endorses regime change in Iran through U.S./Israeli military force. We ask that Media responders challenge the Globe and Mail."

"You state Huckabee’s comments were taken 'out of context' but this is absolutely untrue. Exactly what 'context' were they taken out of? His comments were clear and unequivocal and represents an established pattern of US foreign policy that shows complete disregard for international law and norms of behaviour."