Headline ignores Israel’s responsibility in strike killing Hamas official
"I understand that a headline needs to be attention-grabbing for the reader. However, headlines also frame a story for a reader and influence their perspective even if they read the article in its entirety. Your headline provided inadequate context in terms of Israel’s role in the killing of Mr. Arouri and the potential impact of the killing occurring on Lebanese soil."
Read moreImbalanced coverage of Israeli and Palestinian violence
"Violence in the West Bank has raged for more than a year, amid stepped-up Israeli military raids, increased settler assaults on Palestinian villages, and a spate of Palestinian attacks on Israelis."
Read moreRe: “No, India killing a Canadian is not ‘just like’ America killing bin Laden”
"When one considers the above, “there is no comparison” between the good guys and the others, concludes Coyne. But why compare? The irony is that Coyne warns against tu quoque, or ‘whataboutism,’ while playing a twisted version of the game himself."
Read moreArticle uses harmful “terrorism” rhetoric against Palestinians
"That this language is being repeated more than two months after my last complaint only further establishes the pattern that the CBC’s language around Israeli attacks on Palestinian refugee camps is at risk of being characterized as having a bias over time."
Read moreFailure to describe Israel‘s killing of Palestinians as “assassinations”
"I insist that you state that Israel’s actions do not qualify as “targeted killings” but as “extrajudicial assassinations” as a result of which civilians are also killed or injured, in the interests of accuracy and professional ethics."
Read moreAP article lets Israeli military sources tell the story while Palestinians report the death toll
"In order to be more accurate, efforts should be made to clarify the asymmetrical nature of violence by providing death toll numbers where appropriate, rather than burying them at the end of articles. In this case, death toll numbers should immediately follow the quote in question."
Read moreRadio news segment fails to specify that the west bank is "occupied"
"Your segment fails to clarify that the West Bank is “occupied.” It has become a near-universal journalistic standard that the West Bank be qualified as “occupied” in reporting, as its exclusion obscures important power dynamics at play."
Read moreArticle obscures the outrage of light sentencing an Israeli soldier
"However, it should be mentioned that the article’s emphasis on how uncommon it is for Israeli soldiers to be prosecuted obscures the outrage that 10 days of imprisonment is at all an adequate punishment. Human rights groups are understandably concerned by such light sentencing."
Read moreFailure to specify that the west bank is "occupied" rather than "captured"
On a critical note, I would continue to urge the AP to reconsider its use of the word “captured” when discussing the West Bank. We consistently read and hear the word “occupied” being applied in the context of the conflict between Russia and Ukraine. The same standard ought to apply here, especially as the UN Charter specifically outlaws the acquisition of territory by force.
Read moreOne-sided coverage consistently misrepresents planned Israeli attacks on Palestinians
"Any mention whatsoever of Israel’s “Operation Break the Wave” continues to evade AP’s reporting. I could find no evidence that AP has even once mentioned the Operation. By failing to name that Israel’s “near daily raids” are part of a deliberate, documented military strategy obscures the reality that these attacks on Palestinians are not mere reactions, but part of a planned military operation that is largely offensive by design."
Read more