Where are Palestinian perspectives?
Heritage Minister Marc Miller is given space to make comments that are irrelevant inthe context of an exhibit about the historical ethnic cleansing of Palestinians in1948. Israel did not yet exist, nor did Hamas. Indeed, it raises the question of why the Canadian Heritage Minister is so invested in rewriting the narrative around Israel’s inception.
Read moreThank you + feedback regarding Nakba exhibit
The framing that the Nakba is a “divisive topic” is unfair. The Nakba itself is a historical fact. There is no division about the Nakba. It happened.
Read more
National Post opinion claims Nakba is disputed
The National Post has yet again published an opinion piece by Terry Newman that reads as a mouthpiece for Israeli propaganda.
Read moreInaccurate claim in recent article about CMHR
The article is one-sided and fails to meet journalistic standards of fairness and balance laid out in the Canadian Association of Journalists ethics guidelines.
Read moreInaccurate claim in recent article about CMHR
Perspectives from Palestinian Canadians and alternative Jewish groups are notably absent. As such, the article is one-sided and fails to meet journalistic standards of fairness and balance laid out in the Canadian Association of Journalists ethics guidelines.
Read moreOne-sided reporting on the Nakba exhibit
While I appreciate some of the balance of this article it irresponsibly omits a Palestinian voice or perspective as the story of the Nakba demands. It also lacks a progressive and empathetic Jewish representation of which there are many - Independent Jewish Voices and Jews Say No to Genocide to name only two.
Read more