The Media Accountability Project  

Cotler should be straightforward with Canadians and admit that he views IHRA as opposed to the human rights sector, the UN, and the application of international law itself. Then we could have an honest public debate about whether we think that Canada’s institutions should be restricting criticism of any state’s human rights violations.

It's important to acknowledge that criticism of Israeli policies is not inherently anti-Semitic, just as criticism of Palestinian policies is not inherently anti-Palestinian racism. However, when one crosses the line using language like "brainwashed" and "mass hysteria," it becomes something else entirely.

"The article does a good job of analyzing this event and its implications for academic freedom and democracy, and provides a much-needed Palestinian perspective. These viewpoints are often overlooked or erased in the national discourse about Palestine-Israel. By republishing this article, National Post is contributing to much-needed professional, diverse, and fair-minded coverage on this issue."

"Unfortunately, the article failed to provide sufficient information and lacked necessary context for the readers to be able to understand the nature of Israel’s actions. In particular, your article only notes the context of violence against Israelis, without noting the greater violence against Palestinians.

First, the article fails to mention that Israel’s raid on Aqabat Jabr refugee camp in Jericho took place after the city had been under an Israeli siege for more than a week, and was one of multiple attacks on residents.[2] Second, the raid took place just ten days after a large-scale Israeli attack on the Jenin refugee camp, where at least nine Palestinians were killed by Israeli forces, three being civilians including two children, marking the deadliest single day in the West Bank since 2005.[3] This attack was condemned by UN experts arguing that it contributed to “a dangerous trajectory of violence in the occupied West Bank.”[4]"