National Post at The Media Accountability Project

Complain to National Post for failing to properly label article about the possibility of a regional war in the Middle East

Poor coverage - Media outlet to be critiqued

A CJPME Media Researcher has launched a media alert for the following article. Please submit a quick response to the media, even if it’s just a sentence or two:

Title of Piece: Ehsanullah Amiri: "How Israeli airstrike on Hezbollah, assassination of key Hamas leader in Iran could escalate"

Media Outlet: National Post
Click here to access the piece online. If the article is behind a media paywall, click here to view the article in .pdf format.

Comments of the CJPME Media Researcher:
(Note: Please do not copy and paste the material below as the content to your message to the media - put all comments in your own words):
Ehsanullah Amiri’s article in National Post’s “News” category is undoubtedly a better fit for “Opinion.” Amiri’s article is an interview with Dr. Casey Babb, a senior fellow with the Macdonald-Laurier Institute in Ottawa and an International fellow with the Institute for National Security Studies in Tel Aviv, where he asserts his own thoughts on the possibility of a regional war following Israel’s assassinations of Hezbollah commander, Fuad Shukr, and Hamas’s political leader, Ismail Haniyeh. Please email Ehsanullah Amiri, as well as the editor-in-chief and managing editor at National Post, to inform them of this oversight and other issues with this article.

While Amiri clarifies that the interview has been edited and condensed for clarity and length, he reports a lot of biased, weighted language, like “terrorists,” “genocidal terrorists,” and “terrorist organizations,” while the article is nonetheless labeled as “news.” It is impossible to know if these inflammatory words are the exact phrasing used by the interviewee. Regardless, given that Babb is essentially given a platform to express his opinions at length without skepticism by the journalist, much like an op-ed, this article should be marked as Opinion.
Amiri does not question the claim that the attack in Golan Heights killed 12 “Israeli civilians” and that it was a “terrorist attack.” The reality is other: the 12 children who were killed are Syrian Druze and do not have and refuse to get Israeli citizenship, and Hezbollah has denied being behind this attack. All of this is essential context.
Amiri reports Babb’s inflammatory and dehumanizing language that Hamas are “the worst people on the planet.”
Overall, the article should not be labeled as “news,” but as opinion, especially when the interviewee is not neutral and objective regarding the possible escalation in the region, nor are his comments balanced with other insights.

Please click here to launch an email in which you can draft a response to this media coverage. If this link does not work for you, simply open an email in your email program, address it to [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] , and draft and send your email.

If you have any problems, please email [email protected].

Thank you very much. Every response makes a difference.

The CJPME Media Centre Team
Email CJPME - CJPME Website

Correction required: Gaza is occupied according to ICJ Advisory Opinion

"The Court is viewing that Israel’s withdrawal from the Gaza Strip has not entirely released it of its obligations under the law of occupation. Therefore, Israel is still responsible for what happens in Gaza due to its effective control over the Strip."

Complain to the National Post about a pro-Israel and inflammatory article describing a peaceful protest tactic of showing Palestine liberation messages on electronic road signs as antisemitic and hateful

"The article provocatively characterizes Palestinian liberation messages on electronic road signs, such as 'Free Palestine,' 'Escalate Now,' and 'Globalize the Intifada' as anti-Israel."

National Post: I hope Zionist Grifter Checks Help You Sleep at Night Knowing You Support Genocide Mr. Blaff

"To be frank with you, Mr. Blaff, this article isn’t journalism. It’s a hit piece against an NGO doing vital work within a conflict zone. Simply put, you are a mouthpiece for Israeli propaganda that dehumanizes Palestinians and pressures NGOs from distancing themselves from supporting Palestinians in Gaza."

You can't interview a "survey" National Post

"The headline claims a "huge majority" of York parents fear for Jewish children's safety based on an informal and non-scientific survey. Using such a survey as a credible source goes against journalistic standards. The survey, written by Sharon Aschaiek, only surveyed 193 families. It's irresponsible not to mention in the headline how unscientific this "survey" is. This survey does not represent the broader population and should not be the basis for sweeping claims."

Disputing Vivian Bercovici's apology for genocide

"I don’t doubt that she could find an Israeli government source, or a dubious right-wing source for much of her drivel, but I’m surprised the National Post (NP) is so starved for pro-Israel content that they will print Ms. Bercovici’s unabashed pro-apartheid bunk."

Immediate correction needed: The West Bank is occupied, not "disputed"

"It’s clear that you are referring to Elizabeth May’s trip to the occupied West Bank in 2018. Referring to parts of occupied Palestine as “disputed territories,” is factually incorrect, legally unfounded, and undermines Palestinians’ legitimate indigenous claim to Palestine."

Summary of the genocide in Gaza parrots the perspective of Israel rather than being neutral

What is the National Post’s policy regarding Tweets in its articles? You share tweets that contain inflammatory and racist remarks by users with a history of racism. For example, the tweet from @l3v1at4an accuses people wearing keffiyehs of “pretending to be terrorists.” This is not a unique comment from this account but part of a long history of anti-Palestinian racism and Islamophobia. Including such content without context to bolster a journalist's argument is an alarming and seemingly bad-faith tactic.

National Post columnist praises massacre as "brilliant"

The National Post chose to cover this story by running an op-ed that not only argues that the number of civilians killed is overblown but that even if it is the correct number, Israel is justified in killing civilians because most Palestinians in Gaza are complicit in some form or another.

National Post article is riddled with anti-Palestinian racism

"Conflating these slogans as antisemitic, we believe, meets the legal definition of anti-Palestinian racism as defined by the Arab Canadians Lawyer Association. Anti-Palestinian racism dehumanizes Palestinians and their allies, slandering them as inherently antisemitic for criticizing Israel or opposing the state’s political actions such as committing a genocide in Gaza."

Pages tagged "National Post"