The Media Accountability Project  

"The passive language used, and lack of attribution to particular actors, make this part of the article misleading and unfair. Not including or acknowledging this evidence and additional context constitutes a serious omission, obscuring the extent and causes of the atrocities against Palestinians." Continue reading

"As it stands, the article presents a one-sided Israeli military narrative while excluding or minimizing Palestinian and humanitarian perspectives. I ask that The Globe and Mail and the Associated Press revise this article to include these perspectives, present Israel’s accusations as claims and not fact and properly contextualize the situation as genocide according to the growing body of evidence by human rights groups." Continue reading

"Unfortunately, much of Western media has abandoned core journalistic principles when covering Palestine, echoing Israeli talking points and burying Palestinian voices. By repeating Israeli propaganda and sanitizing the language of occupation, mainstream outlets have become complicit in genocide—normalizing Israel’s ongoing bombardment, ethnic cleansing, mass imprisonment, and detention of Palestinians." Continue reading

"The term “prisoner” suggests a conviction following a fair trial—yet thousands of Palestinians, including children, activists, and journalists, are held without charge or legal recourse. Furthermore, calling Palestinian detainees “prisoners” erases the illegality of their detention and implies guilt where none has been proven." Continue reading

"This baseless and inflammatory claim was presented without any journalistic qualification, counterpoint, or context about Amnesty’s findings. Presenting such a serious allegation without challenge fails the test of “full, fair, and proper presentation” and promotes a one-sided narrative on a matter of urgent public interest."   Continue reading

"Reports confirm that both the Israeli occupation forces and US mercenaries have been deliberately shooting at unarmed Palestinians waiting for food. The matter of the fact is that Israel has manufactured a famine while turning aid into death camps." Continue reading

"The article discusses Iran’s network of proxies, which are widely understood to mean groups like Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Houthis. To lump PYM into the mix is both unfair and inaccurate." Continue reading

"If such extreme views are broadcast in a news segment without explicit clarification that they are personal opinions, it risks violating CBSC Clause 5 – News, which mandates that news be reported with “accuracy and without bias,” and that it not be shaped by the beliefs or desires of those involved in its production." Continue reading

"The omission of this context from your reporting leaves viewers with a distorted impression of the situation. I respectfully ask that your editorial team ensures that future radio broadcasts on Gaza give greater voice to Palestinian civil institutions, such as the Tribal Affairs committee for better journalistic balance and perspectives." Continue reading

"This framing is deeply harmful. It implicitly casts Palestinian protests as threats to public order, reinforcing stereotypes that depict Palestinians and their allies as disruptive, extremist, or violent. Such narratives contribute directly to anti-Palestinian racism by portraying advocacy for Palestinian rights as inherently problematic or unsafe." Continue reading