Erreur grave dans l’extrait : « Tensions entre l’Iran et Israël : entrevue avec Agnès Vahramian à Jérusalem »

« Alors que nous sommes aux portes d’une guerre régionale, il convient de remettre en question les affirmations d'Israël, en particulier celle-ci, car elle sert la stratégie d'Israël à trouver une excuse pour déclencher une guerre régionale et à ne pas vouloir de cessez-le-feu. Madame Drolet a manqué à son devoir journalistique de corriger Madame Vahramian sur cette phrase. » Continue reading

 

Please specify that the JNF is tied to Israel’s history of colonizing Palestinian territory

"Your article is heavily one-sided, giving undue prominence to supporters of the Jewish National Fund (JNF) while characterizing the JNF Negev fundraiser dinner as merely 'a Jewish community event.' I am afraid your use of soft language, whether intentional or not, fails to acknowledge that the JNF is deeply tied to Israel’s history of colonization of Palestinian territory." Continue reading

 

Correction required regarding Canadian weapons exports to Israel

"According to Ms. Paling's findings, Canadian manufacturers could be exporting nearly $95 million more in military goods to Israel by the end of 2025, based on active permits currently held by Canadian companies. These permits, which total $107.7 million, include a range of controlled goods that could potentially be used in the current Israeli military siege on Gaza. It is also worth noting that several Canadian companies involved in military exports to Israel have sought to keep details of their export permits confidential through court actions." Continue reading

 

Why is it okay to describe Sinwar as “the mastermind of the Oct. 7 attacks,” but not Netanyahu as the "mastermind of genocide in Palestine"?

"It is clear that AP used Israel's own words for its headline, which makes this article biased and in violation of journalistic standards. I, therefore, ask you to change your headline and any reference to Sinwar as 'the mastermind of the Oct. 7 attacks' in your article." Continue reading

 

Récent article sur la manifestation propalestinienne dans le cadre du défilé de la Fierté de Montréal cite tout le monde sauf les manifestants propalestiniens

« Vous n’avez consacré qu’une seule phrase aux manifestants propalestiniens. Vous avez paraphrasé leurs motivations plutôt que les citer directement. Vous semez le doute quant au caractère fondé de leurs reproches en écrivant « selon eux ». Vous ne nommez même pas à quel groupe ils appartiennent. » Continue reading

 

RE: Netanyahu’s game

"Many experts have indicated that it would make no strategic sense for Hezbollah to launch an attack on the Golan Heights. Since 1967, the Syrian Golan Heights have been occupied by Israel. Hezbollah is an ally of Assad." Continue reading

 

Surprising that your article does not acknowledge the active participation of Pride committees in supporting Israel’s actions in Gaza through their sponsorships

"The article’s focus on the reactions of Ottawa’s Jewish community without mention of the broader context of the situation in Gaza, where the population is violently being assaulted and going through a genocide at the hands of the Israeli state, is not fair. This context is crucial to understanding the motivations behind pro-Palestinian support at Pride events. The now ten-month genocide in the Gaza Strip, marked by a devastating blockade and frequent military assaults, has galvanized many within the LGBTQ+ community to stand in solidarity with Palestinians." Continue reading

 

If AP is not willing to assign blame on Hezbollah for the rocket attack in the Occupied Golan Heights, how can Global News do so?

"Writing 'in retaliation' attributes responsibility to Hezbollah for the killing of 12 children in the Occupied Golan Heights. At the time of writing, this claim remains meaningfully disputed." Continue reading

 

Heidi Matthews connection to the campus protests

Re: “ A disregard for students’ human rights” (The Telegram, Saturday, August 3, 2024 by Heidi Matthews) Continue reading

 

Correction required: Gaza is occupied according to ICJ Advisory Opinion

"The Court is viewing that Israel’s withdrawal from the Gaza Strip has not entirely released it of its obligations under the law of occupation. Therefore, Israel is still responsible for what happens in Gaza due to its effective control over the Strip." Continue reading