The Media Accountability Project  

"In two sequential sentences, this article reads as follows:'Israel captured east Jerusalem in a 1967 war and later annexed it in a move not internationally recognized. [Paragraph break.] There are roughly 15,000 Christians in Jerusalem today, the majority of them Palestinians who consider themselves living under occupation'. This is inaccurate: the status of Jerusalem is not a matter of subjective Palestinian opinion." Continue reading

"J’ai particulièrement trouvé frappant la mention de la ségrégation dont font l’objet les Palestinien.ne.s et la manière dont vous l’avez illustrée : le président d’Université refoulé à un checkpoint dimanche et les différentes couleurs de plaques d’immatriculation pour les Israélien.ne.s et Palestinien.ne.s." Continue reading

"J’ai apprécié ce photoreportage qui donne une voix aux Palestiniennes et pose un regard sur les enjeux que les femmes agricultrices de Gaza ont à affronter dans leur profession dont leur plus gros obstacle : le blocus terrestre, aérien et maritime d’Israël."   Continue reading

"Violence in the West Bank has raged for more than a year, amid stepped-up Israeli military raids, increased settler assaults on Palestinian villages, and a spate of Palestinian attacks on Israelis." Continue reading

"When one considers the above, “there is no comparison” between the good guys and the others, concludes Coyne. But why compare? The irony is that Coyne warns against tu quoque, or ‘whataboutism,’ while playing a twisted version of the game himself." Continue reading

"Il s’agit d’une erreur géographique de base et il est nécessaire de la corriger dans le but de respecter vos obligations journalistiques et l’intérêt public." Continue reading

"Your coverage of the Run for Palestine contains inaccurate material. You say: “Ever since Israel captured the West Bank in 1967, along with East Jerusalem and the Gaza Strip, violence has regularly erupted between Israelis and Palestinians who each lay claim to various parts of the disputed region.” This is not correct or credible language." Continue reading

"Your choice to not merely cover the event but conduct interviews with its leaders and participants was refreshing to read." Continue reading

"In this light, it is wrong to place the onus of blame on Palestinians for a situation in which Gaza has been under Israeli occupation since 1967 and under an Israeli siege, or blockade, since 2007. Yet in the third paragraph of this article, you introduce the story of recent violence with reference to “two weeks of violent protests” by Palestinians!" Continue reading

"Canadian readers deserve more balance and fairness in the coverage of these events. It’s not the fault of any particular outlet or the result of a conspiracy; it is a problem that requires constant assessment and improvement. What is happening in Gaza today, and the coverage therein, represents a longstanding problem that will take some honesty and courage to fix." Continue reading