The Media Accountability Project  

Ultimately, far greater skepticism is required when reporting on the claims of Warren Kinsella. He is, in my opinion, an unreliable narrator, and this article demonstrates the validity of that view. Continue reading

Ms. Newman is perfectly free to hold pro-Palestinian advocacy in contempt and to criticize it, but she cannot simply invent or ignore facts and the points raised above warrant the issuance of a clarification. Continue reading

"This piece clearly demonstrates how manipulative AI can be in the media and the dangers we face in Canada and globally from propaganda efforts, both now and in the future." Continue reading

Thank you for reading and again, we appreciate the publication of Ms. Johnston’s letter. Continue reading

It is a severe violation of broadcast ethics when a platform is provided for a host and guest that have no idea what they are talking about. Of course they are entitled to their opinions but these must be based in fact, not wild conjecture. Continue reading

Part of our work as part of the Media Accountability Project at CJPME addresses precisely what Sarah mentioned in the interview: Palestinians are denied the “permission to narrate,” to tell their own stories, share their experiences, and to be heard. Mainstream media deliberately leave out the Palestinian narrative, which is why we appreciate that the article platformed Sarah who said that the film actively works against that kind of censorship. Continue reading

"Nous vous remercions pour cette couverture. Cet article couvre de manière large et juste les perspectives pro-palestiniennes. Dans un contexte médiatique où le génocide à Gaza et les revendications des activistes pro-palestiniens sont couverts en leur défaveur par un manque de partialité, votre couverture donne une perspective complète des revendications des manifestants à votre audience." Continue reading

"CTV’s coverage needs to cease casting doubt on the death toll in Gaza.  CJPME demands that future coverage of the death toll be reported as widely recognized and reliable." Continue reading

Specifying that protesters were allowed to block and abuse people going to a religious service is misleading and lacks critical context. Continue reading

Without providing this essential context and failing to report on his response. The Globe and Mail leaves readers with an incomplete and misleading record, after the subject of the piece has provided that exact clarification. This violates basic standards of journalistic balance and fairness. Continue reading