Thanks for reporting on the impact of Israel’s judicial changes on Palestinians under Israeli rule
"It is therefore entirely appropriate, and indeed necessary, for Global National to have reported on the impact of Israel’s judicial changes on Palestinians under Israeli rule. This reporting should necessarily include the impact on the 1.6 million Palestinians who hold second-class Israeli citizenship, as well as the 5.2 million Palestinians under Israeli military occupation in East Jerusalem, the West Bank, and Gaza."
Continue reading
Lack of context regarding the positions of the Israeli government toward Palestinian self-determination
"The article should state that Ben-Gvir is the leader of Otzma Yehudit (Jewish Power), a far-right and racist party with origins in Kahanism, a fascist and terroristic movement which calls for the expulsion of Palestinians from Israel."
Continue reading
Failure to use correct language in describing an Israeli military raid in the occupied West Bank
"Failing to describe these actions by the Israeli military as “military raids” also obscures and takes away from the significance of Palestinian suffering due to these near-nightly operations."
Continue reading
Thanks for providing balanced coverage regarding the impacts of Israel's judicial reforms on Palestinians
"As your headline indicates the ‘ripple’ effects of the judicial overhaul are significant. They impact everyone living within Israel and the occupied Palestinian territory; as well as Israel’s economy and their relationship with the United States."
Continue reading
Thanks for including a question regarding the consequences of Israel's judicial reforms on Palestinians
"I appreciate that you included a question about what the Israeli judicial reforms mean for Palestinians. Palestinian perspectives are important to include in stories about these reforms."
Continue reading
News segment about Israel's "democracy" fails to include context about military occupation and apartheid
"I insist that any future reporting on Israel’s “democracy” include, crucially, the Palestinian perspective in addition to the explicit qualification that it does not extend to everyone under Israeli rule, noting the findings of apartheid from the human rights sector."
Continue reading
Interview fails to include Palestinian perspectives while referring to Israel as a "democracy"
"Israel has no constitution. Instead, it has a set of Basic Laws, none of which explicitly protects equality for all its citizens. On the contrary, numerous apartheid reports have identified the discriminatory laws and practices within Israel which serve to systematically oppress Palestinians."
Continue reading
One-sided reporting and misleading language used to describe Hamas
"I urge you to update this article, either removing the description of Hamas as an 'Islamist militant group', and/or to add that Hamas 'governs the Gaza Strip, providing social services and running media outlets'."
Continue reading
Failure to account for the Palestinian people when addressing Israel's "democracy"
"The segment mentions in depth the current events regarding the judicial reform bill and its ramifications. What I feel is inaccurate is the mention and classification of Israel as a democracy without taking into account the millions of Palestinians who are living in what is now widely recognized as an apartheid system; Israel’s democracy only applies to Israeli citizens."
Continue reading
Inaccurate and misleading language regarding Israel's killing of a Palestinian child in the occupied West Bank
"Your description of a “clash” obscures the Israeli military’s role in provoking the confrontation between stone throwers and heavily armed soldiers. The Israeli military uses sophisticated weapons and equipment whereas the Palestinians, as mentioned in your own coverage, were throwing stones. Your coverage obscures and downplays the asymmetrical nature of the violence."
Continue reading
